User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; cs; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2009021916 Songbird/1.1.2 (20090331142126)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
Songbird 1.1.2closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.9.0.5closeWindows 5.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Songbird 1.1.2closeWindows 5.1media-playercloseclose0.24501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Songbird 1.1 Windows XPdesktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.9closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.9.0.5closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.16801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla 1.9.0.5closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.074 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Songbird 1.1.2Gecko 2009021916Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.34702 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Songbird 1.1.2Gecko 1.9.0Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Songbird 1.1.2closeWindows XPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:01 | by ThaDafinser