User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (LG-T505 AppleWebkit/531 Browser/Phantom/V2.0 Widget/LGMW/3.0 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 Java/A
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGT505closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Phantom Browser 2.0WebKit JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.012 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Phantom Browser 2.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebkit 531closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Phantom 2.0close LGT505mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Java LGT505smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Phantom Browser 2.0close LGT505closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.10101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 531 LGLGT505closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Phantom 2.0Webkit 531 LGT505mobile:featureyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
close LGT505closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:01 | by ThaDafinser