User agent detail

HbbTV/1.1.1 (; CUS:; MB70; 1.0; 1.0;) LOH; Opera; CE-HTML/1.0 NetFront/4.1 NETRANGEMMH
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/other.yaml
NetFront 4.1 MB70televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
NetFront 4.1NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.012 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
NetFront 4.1close closecloseMobile Deviceyesclose0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera CEcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront 4.1close SmartTVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.24301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
NetFront 4.1NetFront tv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1close MB70closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.32702 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NetFront 4.1 MB70televisioncloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
NetFront 4.1close SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
NetFront 4.1close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:57 | by ThaDafinser