User agent detail

Lynx/2.8.6rel.4 libwww-FM/2.14 SSL-MM/1.4.1 OpenSSL/0.9.7l Lynxlet/0.7.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/donatj/phpuseragentparser/Tests/user_agents.json
Lynx 2.8.6rel.4 0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Lynx 2.8 Linux Desktop0.006 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Lynx 2.8closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Lynx 2.8.6rel.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

Lynx 2.8.6rel.4close desktop-browsercloseclose0.24301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Lynx 2.8Text-based 0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Lynx 2.8.6rel.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Lynx 2.8.6close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Lynx 0.7.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Lynx 2.8.6rel.4 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Lynx 2.8.6 closeclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close LynxBrowserOther Non-Mobilecloseclose0.018 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Lynx 2.8.6rel.4close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:56 | by ThaDafinser