User agent detail

SonyEricssonT290a/R101
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SonyEricssonT290aclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SonyEricssonT290a R101closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close Sony EricssonT290amobile-browseryescloseclose0.24101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Sony EricssonT290afeature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SonyEricssonT290acloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.16701 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Sony EricssonSony Ericsson T290acloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Sony EricssonT290amobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SonyEricssonT290aFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close SonyEricssonT290acloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:53 | by ThaDafinser