User agent detail

Opera/9.20 (Windows 98; U; xx)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 9.20 Windows 98desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 9.20Presto 2.0Win98 98Desktop0.011 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera 9.20close closecloseDesktopclose0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 9.20closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 9.20closeWindows 98desktop-browsercloseclose0.24701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 9.20Presto Windows 98desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 9.20closeWindows 98closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.20closeWindows 98 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 9.20 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.17001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 9.20closeWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 9.20 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 9.20 Windows 98desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.20closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 9.20closeWindows 98 Desktopcloseclose0.022 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 9.20closeWindows 98closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:53 | by ThaDafinser