User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-DE; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071103 Midori/0.0.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/donatj/phpuseragentparser/Tests/user_agents.json
Midori 0.0.10 0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Midori 0.0.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.8.1.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.8.1.9closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.27102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Midori WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Midori 0.0.10closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.8.1.9closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.16901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Midori 0.0.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Midori 0.0.10Gecko 20071103Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Midori 0.0.10Webkit Linux desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Midori 0.0.10closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:51 | by ThaDafinser