User agent detail

MOZILLA40 (COMPATIBLE MSIE 60 LINUX MOTOROLA A910I 781) MOT-A910I
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close MotorolaA910Iclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Edge 60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE closeLinux closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Internet Explorer 60close MotorolaA910I 781) MOT-A910Imobile-browseryescloseclose0.23301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Internet Explorer 60Trident GNU/Linux MotorolaA910Ismartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 60closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaA910Icloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Internet Explorer 60 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

MSIE closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer 60Trident Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.27602 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Internet Explorer 60 MotorolaA910I 781) MOT-A910Imobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Internet Explorer 60closeGNU/Linux MotorolaA910Icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:48 | by ThaDafinser