User agent detail

Mozilla/4.5 (compatible; HTTrack 3.0x; Windows 98)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-279.php
yesHTTrackOffline Browser0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesHTTrackOffline Browser0.018 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesHTTrackclose0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeWindows 4.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.23701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Windows 98desktop0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.5closeWindows 98closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 98 closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 4.5 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 4.5 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Windows 98desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows 98closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:48 | by ThaDafinser