User agent detail

curl/7.8 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu) libcurl 7.8 (OpenSSL 0.9.6b) (ipv6 enabled)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
curl 7.8closeRed Hat closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yescURLBot/Crawler0.006 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyescURLclose0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
curl 7.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

cURL 7.8closeLinux software-librarycloseclose0.23101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
curl 7.8 0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

curl 7.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.069 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

cURL 7.8 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesCurlclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.018 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
curl 7.8closeRed Hat closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:47 | by ThaDafinser