User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S9110/S9110XAIK2 NetFront/3.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungGT-S9110closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
NetFront 3.4NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.027 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
NetFront 3.4close closecloseMobile Deviceyesclose0.056 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-GT-S9110 S9110XAIK2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront 3.4close AccessNetFront Ver. 3.4mobile-browseryescloseclose0.23101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
NetFront 3.4NetFront SamsungGT-S9110smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.4close SamsungGT-S9110closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

NetFront 3.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NetFront 3.4 SamsungGT-S9110mobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
NetFront 3.4close AccessNetFront Ver. 3.4Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
NetFront 3.4close SamsungGT-S9110closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:47 | by ThaDafinser