User agent detail

WebVulnCrawl.blogspot.com/1.0 libwww-perl/5.803
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
WebVulnCrawl close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yeslibwwwBot/Crawler0.022 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyeslibwwwclose0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
WebVulnCrawl closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

libwww-perl 5.803close software-librarycloseclose0.24301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Perl 5.803 0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesWebVulnCrawlclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

libwww-perl 5.803close closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Library for WWW in Perl 5.803 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesPerlclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:46 | by ThaDafinser