User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (;;;) AppleWebKit/534.6 HbbTV/1.1.1 (+DL+PVR; smart; CX10; 1.0; 1.0;) CE-HTML/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
SmartCX10tvcloseclose0 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/other.yaml
Webkit 534.6 CX10televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 534.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close media-playercloseclose0.24101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SmartCX10tv0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1close smartCX10closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534.6 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 534.6 SmartCX10televisioncloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:44 | by ThaDafinser