User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US) Gecko/20030908 Epiphany/0.9.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Epiphany 0.9Gecko unknownLinux unknownunknownLinux DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Epiphany 0.9Gecko Linux Desktop0.049 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Epiphany 0.9closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Epiphany 0.9.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.22601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Epiphany 0.9Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Epiphany 0.9.2closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Epiphany 0.9.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.087 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Epiphany 0.9.2Gecko 20030908Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
GNOME Web 0.9.2Gecko Linux desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Epiphany 0.9.2closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:39 | by ThaDafinser