User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux; C -) AppleWebKit/527+ (KHTML, like Gecko, Safari/419.3) Webglance/0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-500.php
yesWeb GlanceBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesWeb GlanceBot/Crawler0.017 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesWeb Glanceclose0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 419.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 419.3closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 419.3closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.23501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 527closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 419.3WebKit 527closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

WebKit 527Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 527Linux desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:38 | by ThaDafinser