User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Amiga; PowerPC AmigaOS 4.1; Odyssey Web Browser; rv:1.23) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) OWB/1.23 Safari/538.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-amigaos.yaml
Odyssey 1.23Webkit 538.1AmigaOS 4.1desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesAmigaBot/Crawler0.07801 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesAmigaclose0.064 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 538.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 538.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 538.1closeAmiga OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.23501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Odyssey Web Browser 1.23WebKit AmigaOS 4.1desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeAmigaOS 4.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.07 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Safari WebKit 538.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Odyssey 1.23Webkit 538.1AmigaOS 4.1desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari closeAmigaOS 4.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:34 | by ThaDafinser