User agent detail

iCab/4.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-gb)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
iCab 4.0WebKit unknownWinVista 6.0unknownWindows DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
iCab 4.0WebKit WinVista 6.0Desktop0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
iCab 4.0closeWinVista closecloseDesktopclose0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
iCab 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeWindows 6.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

iCab 4.0closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.23901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
iCab 4.0WebKit Windows Vistadesktop0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
iCab 4.0closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
iCab 4.0closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

iCab 4.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.14801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

iCab 4.0closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

iCab 4.0 Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
iCab 4.0 Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
iCab 4.0closeWindows Vistacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:33 | by ThaDafinser