User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (MediStream; U; KHTML, like Gecko; Mobile) NetFrontNX/3.0.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/other.yaml
NetFront NX 3.0 MediStreamtelevisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront NXclose media-playeryescloseclose0.23401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
NetFront NetFront 0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0KHTML 3.0.2closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla 3.0.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

NetFront closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NetFront NX 3.0 BewatecMediStreamtelevisioncloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
NetFront NXclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:31 | by ThaDafinser