User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100215 Solaris/10.1 (GNU) Superswan/3.5.8 (Byte/me)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Solaris 10.1desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.9.1.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.9.1.8closeSolaris desktop-browsercloseclose0.24901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Solaris 10.1desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.9.1.8closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla 1.9.1.8closeGNU closecloseclosecloseclose0.08301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 1.9.1.8Gecko 20100215Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42502 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko 1.9.1Linux desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:31 | by ThaDafinser