User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11;) AppleWebKit/534.34 (KHTML, like Gecko) akregator/4.14.1 Safari/534.34
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
yesakregatorBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesakregatorRSS0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesakregatorclose0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 534.34close closecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 534.34close desktop-browsercloseclose0.23201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Akregator 4.14 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 534.34WebKit 534.34closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.084 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Safari WebKit 534.34a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 534.34 closeclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:30 | by ThaDafinser