User agent detail

Mozilla/4.1 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; ) 400x240 LGE VX10000
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGVX10000closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE 6.0close LGVX10000desktop-browsercloseclose0.24001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident LGVX10000smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0close LGVX10000closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Internet Explorer 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.13201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer 6.0Trident closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Internet Explorer 6.0 LGVX10000mobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close LGVX-10000Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Internet Explorer 6.0close LGVX10000closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:25 | by ThaDafinser