User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Odyssey Web Browser; AROS; rv:1.16) AppleWebKit/535.14 (KHTML, like Gecko) OWB/1.16 Safari/535.14
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-aros.yaml
Odyssey 1.16Webkit 535.14AROS desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 535.14closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 535.14close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 535.14closeAROS desktop-browsercloseclose0.22301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Odyssey Web Browser 1.16WebKit 0.014 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.099 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Safari WebKit 535.14 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Odyssey 1.16Webkit 535.14AROS desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:24 | by ThaDafinser