User agent detail

HD2_T8585 Opera/9.7 (Windows NT 5.1; U; xx)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Opera Mobile 9.7 Windows Mobile HD2mobile:smartclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 9.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeWindows 5.1closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera Mobile 9.7closeWindows Mobile HTCHD2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.23501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 9.7Presto Windows XPdesktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 9.7closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.7closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 9.7 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 9.7closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 9.7 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera Mobile 9.7 Windows Mobile HTCHD2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.7closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 9.7closeWindows XPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:23 | by ThaDafinser