User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux armv7l), Safari/537.1+, LG NetCast.TV-2013/01.15.01 (LG, 47LM760T-ZB, wired)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/lg.yaml
LM760Ttelevisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 537.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 537.1+closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close media-playercloseclose0.23501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux LGNetCasttv0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeLinux LGNetCastcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 537.1 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.069 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
LGLM760T NetCast TV 2013televisioncloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari closeGNU/Linux LGNetCastcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:23 | by ThaDafinser