User agent detail

OneBrowser/3.1 (SAMSUNG-S3550/XXJD5)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungS3550closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
OneBrowser 3.1WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.004 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
OneBrowser 3.1close closecloseMobile Phoneyesyesclose0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
OneBrowser 3.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

OneBrowser 3.1close SamsungS3550mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
ONE Browser 3.1WebKit SamsungS3550smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
ONE Browser 3.1close SamsungS3550closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

OneBrowser 3.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
OneBrowser 3.1 SamsungS3550mobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
OneBrowser 3.1close SamsungS3550closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:22 | by ThaDafinser