User agent detail

SEC-SGHE900/10 SAMSUNG JAVA CLIENT
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungJAVAclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.021 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SEC-SGHE900 10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close SamsungJAVA CLIENTmobile-browseryescloseclose0.24801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Java SamsungJAVAsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungJAVAcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.13301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SamsungJAVA CLIENTmobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SamsungSGH-E900Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:18 | by ThaDafinser