User agent detail

LG-L1150 UP.Browser/6.2.3 (GUI) MMP/1.0 UP.Browser/6.2.3.2 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGL1150closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA LGL1150Mobile Phoneyes0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.042 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-L1150 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3close LGL1150mobile-browseryescloseclose0.23001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 LGL1150smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close LGL1150closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3 LGLGL1150closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Openwave 6.2 LGL1150mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close LGL1150Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3close LGL1150closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:16 | by ThaDafinser