User agent detail

Mail/53 CFNetwork/711.2.23 Darwin/14.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-648.php
Apple Mail 0.0WebKit unknowniOS 8.2Applegeneral Mobile DeviceMobile Deviceyesyes0 Detail
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeiOS 8.2closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Apple Mail WebKit iOS 8.2AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.014 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Apple Mail closeiOS closecloseMobile Deviceyesyesclose0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Mail 53closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

closeiOS 8.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
iOS 8.2yes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 711.2.23closeiOS 8.2Applecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
iOS 8.2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
CFNetwork App 8.0closeiOS 8.2AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeMac OS Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:14 | by ThaDafinser