User agent detail

TurnitinBot/1.5 (http://www.turnitin.com/robot/crawlerinfo.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
TurnitinBot 1.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesTurnitinBotBot/Crawler0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesTurnitinBotclose0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
TurnitinBot 1.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closecloseclosecloseyesTurnitinBotclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesclose0.25301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesTurnitinBotCrawler0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesTurnitinBotclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesTurnitinBotCrawler0.069 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:11 | by ThaDafinser