User agent detail

MOT-W419G/[TF359479041653323000000014143392571] Obigo/Q03C MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close MotorolaW419Gclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 3.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.053 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 3.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.083 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MOT-W419G closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo Q 3close MotorolaW419Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.23901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Q03C MotorolaW419Gsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 3close MotorolaW419Gcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 03 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Q03C Browser Q03C closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 3C MotorolaW419Gmobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Teleca Obigo Q03Cclose MotorolaMOT-W419GFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo Q03Cclose MotorolaW419Gcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:09 | by ThaDafinser