User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; NetBSD; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1 Midori/0.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Midori 0.4Webkit NetBSD desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Midori 0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Firefox 4.0.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Firefox 4.0.1closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.23001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Firefox 4.0Gecko NetBSD desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Firefox 4.0.1closeNetBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Midori 0.4closeNetBSD closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Firefox 4.0.1Gecko 2.0.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Midori 0.4closeNetBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Midori 0.4Gecko 20100101a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Midori 0.4Webkit NetBSD desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 4.0.1closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeNetBSD Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Midori 0.4closeNetBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:07 | by ThaDafinser