User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Bada; Opera Mini/6.5/32.855; U; en) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeBada closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera Mini 6.5Presto 2.2Bada 1.0Mobile Phoneyes0.011 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 6.5closebadaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.004 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera Mini 6.5close LGVN270mobile-browseryescloseclose0.23101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera Mini 6.5Presto Bada yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera Mini 6.5close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 6.5closeBada closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Opera Mini 6.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera Mini 6.5Presto 2.8.119 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera Mini 6.5Presto 2.8.119Bada mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera Mini 6.5close OperaMini 6Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera Mini 6.5close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:06 | by ThaDafinser