User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.19) Gecko WebThumb/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
yesWebThumbBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesWebThumbBot/Crawler0.032 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesWebThumbclose0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.9.2.19closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.9.2.19closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.23501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebThumb 1.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.9.2.19closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla 1.9.2.19closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.08101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 1.9.2.19Gecko Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko 1.9.2Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:06 | by ThaDafinser