User agent detail

SonyEricssonw580i/R4EA Java/SEMC-Java/2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 sonyericssonw580i
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SonyEricssonw580iclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
SEMC SymbianOS SonyEricssonW580iMobile Phoneyes0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.063 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SonyEricssonw580i R4EAcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close Sony EricssonW580imobile-browseryescloseclose0.24101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Java Sony Ericssonw580ifeature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SonyEricssonw580icloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.077 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Sony EricssonSony Ericsson w580icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Sony EricssonW580imobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
SEMC-java 2.0close SonyEricssonw580icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:05 | by ThaDafinser