User agent detail

Opera/9.99 (X11; U; sk)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Default Browser 0.0unknown unknownunknown unknownunknownunknownunknown0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 9.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 9.99close desktop-browsercloseclose0.24001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 9.99Presto 0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 9.99close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.99close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 9.99 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15501 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 9.99close closecloseclosecloseclose0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 9.99 a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 9.99 desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.99closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 9.99close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:02 | by ThaDafinser