User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SPHM630 POLARIS/60 MMP/20 PROFILE/MIDP-21 CONFIGURATION/CLDC-11 UNTRUSTED/10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungSPHM630closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-SPHM630 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Polaris 60closeJVM SamsungSPHM630 POLARISmobile-browseryescloseclose0.24901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Polaris 60 SamsungSPHM630smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungSPHM630closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Polaris 60close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Polaris 60 SamsungSPHM630 POLARISmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Polaris 60close SamsungSPHM630closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:00 | by ThaDafinser