User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (LG-C510 AppleWebKit/531 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 MediaPlayer/LGPlayer/1.0 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGC510closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.073 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.08 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 531closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close LGC510mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Java LGC510smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGC510closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 531closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.07901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

5.0WebKit 531 LGLGC510closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 531 LGC510mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close LGC510closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:55:00 | by ThaDafinser