User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; Pt-br; lg-gx200) UCBrowser8.2.0.132/69/352/UCWEB Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGgx200closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.075 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.066 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.006 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close LGgx200mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 8.2 LGgx200smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.0close LGgx200closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 8.2.0.132 LGLGgx200closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 8.2Gecko LGgx200mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close UCWebUCBrowserFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 8.2.0.132close LGgx200closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:57 | by ThaDafinser