User agent detail

Mozilla/4.08 (N905imyu_W;FOMA;c500;TB)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
N905imyumobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.3.0
vendor/woothee/woothee-testset/testsets/mobilephone_docomo.yaml
docomo N905imyu_Wclosedocomo closeclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close NECN905imyumobile-browseryescloseclose0.24201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.08close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoN905imyucloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 4.8 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NECN905imyumobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo N905imyu_Wcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close DoCoMoN905iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:54 | by ThaDafinser