User agent detail

LG/KF690/v10a Browser/Obigo-Q05A/3.12 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGKF690closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 5.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.017 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 5.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG KF690closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM LGKF690mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo LGKF690smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 5close LGKF690closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 05 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.08401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Browser LGLGMMScloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 5A LGKF690mobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close LGKF690Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo close LGKF690closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:50 | by ThaDafinser