User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/4.1; Linux) KHTML/4.1.3 (like Gecko) SUSE
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Konqueror 4.1KHTML 4.1.3SUSE desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Konqueror 4.1KHTML Linux Desktop0.019 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Konqueror 4.1closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Konqueror 4.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.24201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Konqueror 4.1KHTML SUSE desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Konqueror 4.1;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.1closeSUSE closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0KHTML 4.1.3closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Konqueror 4.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.075 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Konqueror 4.1 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Konqueror 4.1KHTML 4.1.3SUSE desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Konqueror 4.1closeopenSUSE closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:48 | by ThaDafinser