User agent detail

Opera/9.27 (X11; Linux i686; U; xx)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 9.27 Linux desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 9.27Presto 2.0Linux Desktop0.012 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera 9.27closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 9.27closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 9.27closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.24101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 9.27Presto GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 9.27closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.27closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 9.27 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 9.27closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.069 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 9.27 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 9.27 Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.27closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 9.27closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 9.27closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:45 | by ThaDafinser