User agent detail

DoCoMo/1.0/N505i/c20/TB/W24H12
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Woothee
v1.3.0
vendor/woothee/woothee-testset/testsets/mobilephone_docomo.yaml
docomo N505iclosedocomo closeclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
DoCoMo 1.0 JAVA NECN505iMobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
DoCoMo 1.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
DoCoMo 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront close DoCoMomobile-browseryescloseclose0.23001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
DoCoMoN505ifeature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

N505icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NECN505imobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo N505icloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close DoCoMoN505iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
DoCoMo 1.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:42 | by ThaDafinser