User agent detail

Opera/9.21 (X11; Linux i686; U; xx)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 9.21 Linux desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 9.21Presto 2.0Linux Desktop0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera 9.21closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 9.21closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 9.21closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.23001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 9.21Presto GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 9.21closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.21closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 9.21 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 9.21closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 9.21 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 9.21 Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.21closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 9.21closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.024 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 9.21closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:42 | by ThaDafinser