User agent detail

Yahoo Pipes 2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Woothee
v1.3.0
vendor/woothee/woothee-testset/testsets/crawler.yaml
close closecloseclosecloseyesYahoo! Pipesclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesYahoo PipesBot/Crawler0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesYahoo Pipesclose0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Yahoo closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closecloseclosecloseyesYahooclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesYahoo! Pipesclose0.23901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseclosecloseyesYahooclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesYahoo! Pipesclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesYahoo! Pipesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:39 | by ThaDafinser