User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.5; Linux 2.6.27.47-TSDX; X11; x86_64; es) KHTML/3.5.7 (like Gecko),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeLinux 2.6.27closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Konqueror 3.5KHTML Linux Desktop0.072 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Konqueror 3.5closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.065 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Konqueror 3.5closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.24501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Konqueror 3.5KHTML GNU/Linux desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Konqueror 3.5;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 3.5closeLinux 2.6.27closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0KHTML 3.5.7closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Konqueror 3.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.09 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Konqueror 3.5 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Konqueror 3.5KHTML 3.5.7Linux desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Konqueror 3.5closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:38 | by ThaDafinser