User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/4.5; Linux) KHTML/4.5.5 (like Gecko) Kubuntu
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Konqueror 4.5KHTML 4.5.5Kubuntu desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Konqueror 4.5KHTML 4.5Linux Desktop0.035 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Konqueror 4.5closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeUbuntu closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Konqueror 4.5closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.24701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Konqueror 4.5KHTML Kubuntu desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Konqueror 4.5;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.5closeKubuntu closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0KHTML 4.5.5closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Konqueror 4.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.077 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Konqueror 4.5 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Konqueror 4.5KHTML 4.5.5Kubuntu desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Konqueror 4.5closeKubuntu closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:35 | by ThaDafinser