User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 Firebird/0.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Firefox 0.7Gecko 1.0Win98 98unknownWindows DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Firefox 0.7Gecko 1.0Win98 98Desktop0.017 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.5closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Firebird (old name for Firefox) 0.7closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.23901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Firebird 0.7Gecko Windows 98desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Firebird 0.7close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 98 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Firebird 0.7Gecko 1.5closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Firebird 0.7closeWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.075 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Firebird 0.7Gecko 20031007Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Firebird 0.7Gecko 1.5Windows 98desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Firebird 0.7closeWindows 98 SEcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:34 | by ThaDafinser