User agent detail

SmartTV/1.0.0 (SAMSUNG;OTV-SMT-E5015;0x01;BAC.2012.05.12)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
SamsungSMT-E5015tvcloseclose0 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/samsung.yaml
Olleh SkyLife Smart Settopboxtelevisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SmartTV 1.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close media-playercloseclose0.23801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SamsungSMT-E5015tv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SamsungOlleh SkyLife Smart Settopboxtelevisioncloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Maple Browser close Samsung Smart TVcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:33 | by ThaDafinser