User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; ABrowse 0.4; Syllable)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
ABrowse 0.4WebKit unknownSyllable unknownunknowngeneral DesktopDesktop0 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-syllable.yaml
ABrowse 0.4 Syllable desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
ABrowse 0.4WebKit Syllable Desktop0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
ABrowse 0.4closeSyllable closecloseDesktopclose0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

ABrowse 0.4closeSyllable desktop-browsercloseclose0.26302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
ABrowse 0.4 Syllable desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

ABrowse 0.4closeSyllable closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
ABrowse 0.4 Syllable desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:54:28 | by ThaDafinser